Skip to main content

UNIT 16: Federal Indian Policy Series

Indian Reorganization Era

From 1934 to 1953, the Indian Reorganization Act reversed the Allotment policy that had stripped 90 million acres from Tribal nations. It was a turning point - but not a clean one. This unit, you research what changed and what didn't.

📜 7 Stages
ðŸŠķ Intermediate
⏱ïļ 45–60 min per stage
1934 – 1953

Federal Indian Policy Series: Unit 16 of 19

This unit is part of an eight-era series. Each era gets its own research website. When all eight are complete, you will combine them into one multi-page site in Unit 20.

Unit 12 · Treaty-Making Unit 13 · Removal Unit 14 · Reservation System Unit 15 · Allotment & Assimilation Unit 16 · Reorganization Unit 17 · Termination Unit 18 · Self-Determination Unit 19 · Nation Rebuilding

The Big Idea

After 47 years of allotment, federal policy reversed course. The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 ended new allotments, restored some land to Tribal ownership, and allowed Tribes to adopt their own constitutions. On paper it was a major shift. In practice, it was complicated - the constitutions came with significant federal oversight, and not all Tribes accepted the IRA.

In this unit, you'll build a research website about the Indian Reorganization Era. The new CSS pattern is a tabbed interface - click a tab and the content below changes without the page reloading. You'll use it to organize the laws, nations, and voices of the era.

Red Lake Nation didn't accept the IRA. They maintained full sovereignty and kept their own governance structure. That decision still matters today. This unit is where you research why.

By the end of this unit, you'll be able to say "I can..."

  • Build a tabbed interface where clicking a tab changes the displayed content
  • Organize complex historical content into clear, navigable sections
  • Research the Indian Reorganization Act and its real-world effects on specific nations
  • Document both the progress and the limitations of IRA policy
  • Write your own analysis comparing what was promised with what happened

What You'll Build

A research website about the Indian Reorganization Era (1934-1953) - six sections, Prussian blue archival design.

A tabs section for the policies of the era. Nation profiles on those who accepted the IRA and those who didn't. Your research in your own words.

This era is often called a 'New Deal for Native Americans.' Your website shows what that actually meant.

This era reversed 47 years of allotment. But reversal isn't the same as repair. This unit explores the difference.

Your learning path

The 7 Stages

Let's Begin

← Back to All Units

Sources

The historical content in this unit draws from federal primary sources, peer-reviewed scholarship, official Tribal nation records, and Bureau of Indian Affairs documentation. The land loss continuation figures and fractionation data draw from the Indian Land Tenure Foundation and Bureau of Indian Affairs records. The analysis of IRA boilerplate constitutions and their governance implications is drawn primarily from Deloria and Lytle's The Nations Within (1984), the most thorough scholarly account of how the IRA was designed, implemented, and received by Tribal nations across the country.

Primary Legislative & Government Sources

Academic & Scholarly Sources

  • Deloria, Vine Jr. and Clifford Lytle. The Nations Within: The Past and Future of American Indian Sovereignty. University of Texas Press, 1984. The essential analysis of the Indian Reorganization Act: its design, its implementation, Tribal responses to it, and its long-term consequences for Tribal governance. The chapters on IRA constitutions and the nature of "self-government" under the federal template are the primary source for Stage 4's comparison of the IRA model with Indigenous governance traditions. Written by a Standing Rock Sioux scholar and a legal scholar.
  • Wilkins, David E. American Indian Politics and the American Political System. Rowman & Littlefield. Situates the IRA within the broader history of federal Indian law, including the tension between the self-determination rhetoric of the Collier era and the continued federal oversight authority that IRA constitutions built into their structure through Secretarial approval requirements.
  • Canby, William C. American Indian Law in a Nutshell, 6th ed. West Academic, 2015. The standard legal reference on federal Indian law. The chapters on Tribal sovereignty and self-governance under the IRA framework are essential for understanding how the constitutional authority granted by the IRA interacted with existing treaty rights and the federal trust relationship.
  • Prucha, Francis Paul. The Great Father: The United States Government and the American Indians. University of Nebraska Press, 1984. Comprehensive history of federal Indian policy from the founding era to the late twentieth century. The sections on the Collier era and the passage of the IRA document the political context and congressional debate that shaped the final legislation.

Educational Standards

This unit aligns with computer science, social studies, and Indigenous education standards across MN, ND, and SD. Click a panel to expand.

  • OSEU.SS.H.2, Federal Policy and Self-Determination (All Grades): Students will analyze how federal policies affected the sovereignty, land base, and self-determination of Tribal nations over time. (The Indian Reorganization Act is both a reform and a continuation. It ended allotment but did not restore most of what allotment took. It authorized Tribal self-government but offered a template that was designed by federal officials using Western governance models. Students build Stage 2 to understand what the IRA authorized and Stage 4 to understand how the constitutional template it offered differed from the governance traditions Tribal nations already had. The gap between those two things is the argument of this unit.)
  • OSEU.SS.H.3, Treaty Rights and Sovereignty (All Grades): Students will understand how federal policy interacted with Tribal sovereignty across different eras. (The IRA's constitutional authorization is sometimes described as restoring Tribal sovereignty. It is more precise to say that it authorized a specific form of Tribal government that the federal government was willing to recognize. The Secretarial approval requirement built into most IRA constitutions meant that major Tribal decisions required sign-off from the Interior Department. Some nations, like Red Lake, already had governance structures that did not need federal authorization and chose not to reorganize under the IRA template. Students document this distinction in Stage 4 and Stage 5.)
  • OSEU.SS.C.1, Identity and Culture (All Grades): Students will understand the cultural practices and governance traditions of Indigenous peoples and how federal policy has interacted with them. (Stage 4's comparison slider presents this directly: on one side, the features of Indigenous governance traditions that were developed over centuries, rooted in specific relationships to land, community, and ceremony; on the other side, the features of the IRA constitutional template. Students are not asked to judge which is better. They are asked to see the difference and to understand what it meant to ask nations with functioning governance systems to adopt a foreign template in order to be recognized.)
  • OSEU.ELA.W.1, Research Writing (All Grades): Students will produce research-based writing appropriate to task and purpose. (Stage 5's personal research card asks students to document a specific Tribal nation's IRA experience: did it adopt a constitution? What was the vote? What was the land base in 1934 and what changed? This research produces a published section of the student's website. The official Tribal nation websites listed in the sources section are the starting point; the BIA and National Archives IRA records are the corroborating federal sources.)
  • CSTA 2-AP-13 (Grades 6–8): Decompose problems and subproblems into parts to facilitate the design, implementation, and review of increasingly complex programs. (The comparison slider in Stage 4 decomposes into four components: the outer container, the two content panels, the draggable handle, and the JavaScript that connects mouse or touch position to panel width. Students build each layer with understanding before the interaction is wired up. The same decomposition approach they have used for CSS layouts applies here to a component that has both CSS and JavaScript parts.)
  • CSTA 2-AP-17 (Grades 6–8): Systematically test and refine programs using a range of test cases. (The drag interaction introduced in Stage 4 requires testing at multiple states: what happens at the leftmost position, the rightmost position, and at positions in between. Students are directed to drag the slider to both extremes in the preview and verify that neither panel disappears completely. The touch event handling is pre-built and explained; students test it by dragging on a touchscreen or simulating touch in the browser's developer tools.)
  • ISTE 1c, Empowered Learner: Students use technology to demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways. (The comparison slider is a demonstration of learning built directly into the student's website. A reader who drags the handle is doing the comparison themselves, not reading someone else's summary of the comparison. The interactivity is the argument. Students who understand why the comparison is structured as a slider rather than two side-by-side cards understand something about how design choices carry meaning.)
  • ISTE 3b, Knowledge Constructor: Students evaluate the accuracy, perspective, credibility, and relevance of information, media, data, or other resources. (The boilerplate constitution analysis in Stage 4 draws on Deloria and Lytle's The Nations Within alongside the BIA's official Tribal government records. Students are encountering a case where a policy that was described as beneficial at the time has been documented by Native scholars as having significant limitations. Evaluating both the official federal framing and the scholarly critique is part of the sourcing work in this unit.)
  • MN Social Studies 8.4.4.18.1 (Grade 8): Describe the origin, development, and impact of major federal policies affecting American Indian people in Minnesota. (Minnesota's Ojibwe nations responded differently to the IRA. White Earth adopted an IRA constitution in 1936. Red Lake did not, choosing to maintain its existing governance structure and closed reservation status. Leech Lake, Fond du Lac, Mille Lacs, and other bands took various paths. Stage 5 documents these regional differences and directs students to the official histories published by each nation's website. For Minnesota students, the contrast between White Earth and Red Lake is the most direct regional illustration of what the IRA's constitutional offer meant in practice.)
  • MN Social Studies 9-12.4.4.18.2 (Grades 9–12): Analyze the legal foundations of Tribal sovereignty and the federal trust relationship, including federal policy eras and their ongoing impact. (The IRA constitutions adopted in the 1930s remain the governing documents for many Minnesota Tribal nations today. Students are directed to look up whether the nation they are researching operates under an IRA-era constitution or a more recently adopted document. The comparison between an IRA-era constitution and a nation's current constitution, where they differ, is a direct measure of how governance has evolved since the Reorganization Era.)
  • MN CS K-12 6.2.1 / 7.2.1 (Grades 6–7): Use a development process to plan, design, and iteratively develop computational artifacts. (The comparison slider introduced in Stage 4 is a new kind of component: it has a visual state that changes in response to user input. Students who have built static CSS layouts are now building something that updates dynamically. The JavaScript uses getBoundingClientRect() to calculate the slider's position within the container and converts that to a percentage. This is the first time students work with element geometry in JavaScript.)
  • MN ELA 8.3.3.1 (Grade 8): Use technology to produce and publish writing that demonstrates command of the conventions of standard English. (Stage 5 and Stage 6 require original documented writing. Stage 5 asks for a researched section about a specific Tribal nation's IRA experience. Stage 6 asks students to document their sources. Both sections render on the student's live website, framing the work as publication rather than assignment.)
  • ND Indigenous Studies, History and Government (All Grades): Understand the historical and political relationship between the United States government and Indigenous nations of North Dakota, including the Reorganization Era. (North Dakota's Tribal nations each have distinct IRA histories. The Three Affiliated Tribes (MHA Nation) adopted an IRA constitution in 1936. Standing Rock adopted a constitution in 1959. Spirit Lake adopted a constitution in 1960. Turtle Mountain adopted a constitution in 1932, before the IRA, and amended it after. Students researching North Dakota nations are directed to each nation's official history for the specific vote and adoption record. The BIA's Tribal government records include the original constitutional documents for federally recognized Tribes.)
  • ND SS 9-12.6.2 (Grades 9–12): Analyze the role of federal law and Supreme Court decisions in shaping the political, legal, and economic status of American Indian nations. (The IRA's Secretarial approval requirement is a legal provision that students encounter in Stage 4. Major decisions made by IRA constitutional governments required review and approval from the Secretary of the Interior. This requirement was gradually reduced over subsequent decades but was a significant constraint on Tribal self-governance in the IRA era. Students who trace the evolution from IRA-era constitutions to the self-determination era of the 1970s are following a continuous line of legal development.)
  • ND CS 6.E.1 / 7.E.1 / 8.E.1 (Grades 6–8): Create artifacts by applying existing knowledge of computing concepts and practices. (The slider's JavaScript applies event listener knowledge from Units 9 and 10 in a new context. Students already know that addEventListener('click', ...) listens for a user action and runs a function. The slider uses 'mousedown', 'mousemove', and 'mouseup' in a sequence: start tracking on mousedown, update position on mousemove, stop tracking on mouseup. This is the first time students work with a multi-event interaction sequence rather than a single click handler.)
  • ND CS 9-12.E.3 (Grades 9–12): Design and iteratively develop computational artifacts for practical intent, personal expression, or to address a societal need. (The comparison slider is a design choice with an argument. Showing the federal governance model alongside traditional governance systems as a drag-to-reveal interface makes the comparison something the user does, not something they read about. Students who build this component understand that interactive design choices carry meaning, and that the form of a presentation is itself part of the argument.)
  • OSEU Standard 1, History (All Grades): Understand the history of the Oceti Sakowin and other Indigenous peoples, including the Reorganization Era and the Indian Reorganization Act. (South Dakota's Lakota nations entered 1934 with heavily reduced land bases following the 1889 Great Sioux Agreement and subsequent allotment. The IRA offered a path to reconstituted Tribal government at a moment of significant institutional weakness. Pine Ridge, Rosebud, Cheyenne River, Crow Creek, Lower Brule, and Yankton all engaged with the IRA process. Students researching South Dakota nations are directed to the Standing Rock and Oglala Sioux Tribe official websites as starting points and to the BIA Tribal government records for constitutional adoption dates.)
  • OSEU Standard 3, Sovereignty and Government (All Grades): Understand the sovereign status of Tribal nations and how federal policy shaped governance structures across different eras. (The IRA constitutions are the governance documents that many South Dakota Tribal nations operate under today, though many have since been amended or replaced. Students who look up their nation's current constitution and compare it to the original IRA-era document are doing primary source research about living governance structures. The question of how Indigenous governance traditions fit within, alongside, or outside of those constitutional frameworks is an active one in Tribal politics across South Dakota.)
  • SD Social Studies 9-12.H.2 (Grades 9–12): Analyze the causes and effects of major federal policies affecting Indigenous peoples of South Dakota. (The IRA's credit fund for Tribal economic development was one of its concrete provisions: $10 million was authorized to be loaned to Tribal corporations for economic development. For South Dakota nations that had experienced severe poverty under allotment, this represented a meaningful resource. Stage 2 documents the IRA's provisions including the credit fund, the land acquisition authority, and the constitutional authorization in specific terms, so students understand what the policy actually offered rather than just what it was named.)
  • SD CS 6-8.AP.M.1 (Grades 6–8): Decompose problems and subproblems into parts to facilitate the design, implementation, and review of increasingly complex programs. (The slider's four-part decomposition maps onto the decomposition practice students have used throughout the curriculum: identify the parts, build each part, then connect them. The new part in Stage 4 is the JavaScript connection: a drag position in pixels becomes a percentage, and that percentage sets a CSS width. Students who understand that conversion understand the core mechanism of a large class of interactive components.)